Fujifilm vs Sony: An Experience Based Comparison

I own both Fujifilm and Sony mirrorless cameras and love them both.

I use Sony full-frame cameras for professional photography and Fujifilm mirrorless cameras for personal use.

Not everyone is lucky enough to own both Fuji and Sony cameras, so that’s where this guide comes in.

I’ll help you decide between the best Fujifilm and Sony cameras to discover which system is right for you.

We’ll also take a look at some comparisons of popular models from both camera brands.

Comparison of Sony Crop Sensor Cameras vs. Fuji Cameras

For a fair comparison, this first section of the guide will focus on APS-C cameras from both brands.

This assumes that you’re trying to decide between a Sony a6000 series crop sensor camera and a Fujifilm X-Series camera (which are all crop sensor.)

If this isn’t the case, see later in the article where we discuss Sony’s full-frame advantage.

Autofocus Performance

One of the most common praise points regarding Sony’s range of APS-C cameras in the A6000 series is the high-quality autofocus performance.

Responsive and reliably accurate, cameras such as the A6000 also feature eye autofocus, making them exceptionally useful for shooting video while tracking subjects.

While Fujifilm’s line of APS-C cameras also offer effective autofocus, it lacks the precision of its Sony counterparts, notably when compared to Sony’s Real-Time Eye AF.

Additionally, Fujifilm’s AF tracking sometimes struggles to switch between people with facial detection when using the continuous autofocus mode.

With that said, the company continues improving performance in this domain, and provided you aren’t shooting videos of sporting events, its shortcomings can be easily overlooked.

Color Science

A consistent point of praise for Fujifilm’s crop sensor cameras – and their brand in general – is a wonderfully vibrant and bright color reproduction in their images.

Cameras like the Fujifilm X-T3 have improved over their predecessors, assisted by an expanding range of available color profiles.

While Fujifilm’s color science is noted for its classic chrome with a green-orange tone, Sony images veer toward a stronger magenta tint.

Comparing Fujifilm vs. Sony in terms of overall color science and image quality is essentially a matter of preference since both can be adjusted in the settings to match one another.

ISO Performance

Shooting crisp and noise-free images in low light conditions is another core consideration for photographers when deciding whether to invest in a Fujifilm or Sony camera.

While you can achieve pleasing results with a Fuji camera at high ISO settings such as 12800, Sony cameras have a slight edge in overall performance.

With that said, this slight edge is negligible, and if you’re shooting with a lower ISO setting, you’ll be hard-pushed to notice any differences between the two.

If optimal low-light performance is crucial to your shooting style, it’s recommended to go the extra mile and pick up a full-frame camera, which we’ll explore in more detail below.

Dynamic Range

Another common point of praise for Sony cameras is the incredible dynamic range they offer that allows for the recovery of exceptional levels of detail in post-production.

The Sony A6000, in particular, is noted for its great performance at base ISO settings, delivering a commendable 12 stops of range and holding its own when compared to any other APS-C camera on the market.

While Fujifilm’s X-Trans sensor makes measuring accurate dynamic range challenging, the results compare well alongside images shot using Sony sensors.

In fact, some Fujifilm photographers prefer the dynamic range offered by cameras such as the Fuji X-TS when compared to Sony’s A6000 and others in that range.

Lens Selection

When assessing and comparing the lens selection between Fujifilm and Sony, it’s important to begin with a caveat outlining how the comparison can depend on what you’re hoping to shoot.

The Fuji X Mount series offers a broad selection of great lenses that complement the X-Trans CMOS sensor, although many of these aren’t constructed for dust and splash protection.

On the other hand, while Sony is well regarded for its stellar lenses, Sony lenses for APS-C are not as well-served as their Fujifilm counterparts.

Indeed, Sony has pulled back from manufacturing APS-C lenses in recent years, although their interchangeable lens system does mean if you own an APS-C camera body, you still have plenty of choices.

With that said, if you’re a casual or hobbyist photographer struggling to decide which camera brand to go for, between Fuji vs. Sony, there are plenty of versatile lenses from both companies to get you started.

Video Capabilities

Regarding video specs and overall performance, Sony’s range of APS-C cameras emerges as the clear winner when compared to Fujifilm’s offerings.

Sony has considerable pedigree manufacturing cameras used for professional videography, and it shows in their consumer-level products.

Functionality is generally more comprehensive than their Fujifilm counterparts, assisted by better autofocus in low light with more accurate tracking of subjects.

That’s not to say Fujifilm’s APS=C cameras underperform, and most models are true to their hybrid claim, particularly if you go for a more expensive Fujifilm camera such as the Fujifilm X-H2S.

Likewise, the X-T series delivers strong in-body image stabilization that competes with the best Sony has to offer and makes it a great choice for vlogging on the move.

Build and Ergonomics

Fujifilm’s cameras have earned a loyal following largely due to their retro aesthetics, both in the image quality and camera body designs.

They’re chunky and tactile to use, with large and responsive mechanical dials that make them favored by old-school photographers with a background working with film.

Fujifilm is well known for producing digital cameras that look like film cameras, making them unique and popular in this regard.

In contrast, Sony cameras have a sleeker, more modern design that eschews the vintage style of Fujifilm, with a comfortable thumb grip and fewer manual controls.

One complaint that is often leveled at Sony because of this build and control setup is it can sometimes feel a little characterless, with functionality through menus and screens rather than physical dials or controls.

Ultimately, it comes down to your preferred shooting style, with those looking for a travel camera often saying they prefer Fujifilm for spur-of-the-moment street photography.

User interface and Usability

Sony’s reputation for delivering a confusing and complex menu system has waned recently, with improvements that help with your photography workflow.

Fortunately, the electronics company has upped its game in recent years and ironed out these flaws in the user interface to improve the overall useability.

While the build design’s use of many buttons when compared to Fujifilm’s use of dials can be viewed as a drawback, it does give Sony cameras the edge when it comes to customization.

Their cameras typically include a host of custom buttons that can be tailored to your shooting needs, whereas the Fujifilm cameras face more limitations.

Pricing and Value for Money

When it comes to value for money, particularly if you’re hoping to get set up on a budget, Fujifilm wins, although only by a small margin.

Equivalent APS-C camera bodies from each company are roughly the same price, with Sony only slightly more expensive, while the second-hand market has a wealth of choices from both brands to suit a lower budget.

Fujifilm’s high-end APS-C camera, the X-H2S, is equivalent in price to Sony’s full-frame mirrorless cameras, so it pays to research your shooting needs before investing in new gear.

Battery Life

Both Sony and Fujifilm have been continuing to upgrade the battery performance of their cameras as each new iteration is launched on the market.

While both the Sony A6600 and the Fujifilm X-T4 boasted enhanced battery life over their predecessors, the A6600 wins the contest hands-down.

This camera can deliver an exceptional 810 shots on a single battery charge, compared to the 600 exposures offered by the X-T4.

With that said, if you’re a casual hobbyist photographer, performance from both brands is perfectly acceptable for a day’s shoot.

Innovation and Advanced Features

Both Sony and Fujifilm are noted for their innovative approach to camera design, with each manufacturer noted for various tools to help the shooting process.

With Fujifilm, there’s an emphasis on the retro aesthetic that carries through their body design, most notably with their many great film simulation modes.

These modes can be used to quickly achieve a film-like look, which is made simpler thanks to their hybrid viewfinder combining an optical and electronic viewfinder.

If you want a digital camera that produces film-like photos, Fujifilm is the clear winner in this regard.

Sony film-simulation recipes exist, but they’re not built into the cameras and require some experimentation.

As has already been touched on above, Sony excels in autofocus, particularly with their advanced eye autofocus technology.

Regarding the available apps the brands provide, Sony offers their users the Imagin Edge Mobile to speed up the remote shooting process.

Fujifilm’s Camera Remote includes similar tools, although reviews for the app are generally lackluster, with professionals generally opting for Capture One.

Community and Support

Fujifilm and Sony both offer their customers full support, with a generally high level of customer satisfaction reported for Fujifilm.

Sony, on the other hand, is often ranked among the worst for their customer support, although it’s worth noting that this can vary depending on which country you’re in.

Fujifilm’s level of community support is also widely regarded as superior, with a higher degree of brand loyalty and more active and responsive community boards.

In this regard, Fujifilm generally comes out on top, with Sony having some way to go to improve their reputation and response times.

Future Roadmap and Commitment

Since both Fujifilm and Sony are Japanese companies, they operate similarly regarding their approach to improvements and future planning.

Fujifilm has operated on the Kaizen business model, meaning change for the better and continual improvement. However, some believe the company has lost its emphasis on this approach recently.

Both brands have a steady stream of cameras and lenses in the pipeline, although it’s worth being mindful of Sony’s focus primarily on their mirrorless camera range.

In terms of firmware updates for users, Fujifilm has often dominated the field compared to Sony, although the latter has made efforts to improve its firmware update pipeline.

Sensor Size Advantage: Sony Full Frame Cameras vs. Fujifilm Cameras

This article has focused on comparing Fujifilm vs Sony cameras in the APS-C category, with Fujifilm working entirely within this space.

However, it’s worth considering the advantages of using a full-frame mirrorless camera from Sony if you want to go the extra mile regarding potential results.

The first and most obvious benefit of choosing a full-frame camera is the larger sensor size that allows you to capture more information.

As such, you won’t experience any cropping with a full-frame camera, so you can work with the full field of view and fit more in your images.

This increase in sensor size also brings with it a higher dynamic range for more detail, as well as the ability for improved low light performance thanks to better ISO capabilities.

The necessity to use longer focal lengths on full-frame cameras also makes it easier to create wonderful bokeh effects at shallow depths of field.

These advantages also heavily influence the better video capture performance of full-frame cameras. So, if you’re a content creator or filmmaker, it’s a clear win for this type of camera.

With all of that said, APS-C cameras are capable of delivering stunning results, and the increase in quality may not be worth the price unless you’re a professional photographer.

Why Doesn’t Fuji Make Full Frame Cameras?

If you’re considering investing in a full-frame camera, you may have noticed that there are no Fujifilm models available in this category.

Fujifilm has stated its belief that the market for full-frame cameras is too crowded and competitive, making it a risky investment prospect.

At the same time, medium format cameras that are compact and capable of great images and footage are more affordable for a broader, more casual marketplace.

And with full-frame cameras from other brands such as Canon and Nikon proving to be hugely successful, it’s unlikely Fujifilm will attempt to jostle into this market any time soon.

Comparing 3 Popular Fuji and Sony Cameras

Here are some comparisons of some popular Sony and Fuji cameras.

Note that we compare full-frame Sony cameras with crop-sensor Fuji cameras in the first two cases.

The third comparison is a more fair comparison of crop sensor cameras from each brand.

Fuji X-T4 vs Sony a7III

• Sensor Size and Resolution:
  • Fuji X-T4: APS-C-sized sensor with a resolution of 26.1 megapixels.
  • Sony a7III: Full-frame sensor with a resolution of 24.2 megapixels.
• Dynamic Range:
  • Fuji X-T4: Offers a dynamic range of approximately 14 stops, especially when using the F-Log profile in video. This provides flexibility in post-processing, especially for recovering shadow and highlight details.
  • Sony a7III: Boasts a dynamic range of around 14-15 stops, making it excellent for situations with high contrast, such as landscapes and studio settings.
• High ISO Performance:
  • Fuji X-T4: Delivers clean images up to ISO 3200. Noise starts to become noticeable at ISO 6400, but the camera’s performance remains commendable up to ISO 12800, especially for an APS-C sensor.
  • Sony a7III: Due to its full-frame sensor, the a7III excels in low light. Images remain detailed and relatively noise-free up to ISO 6400. Even at ISO 12800 and 25600, the results are quite usable, with well-controlled noise.
• Image Stabilization:
  • Fuji X-T4: Features in-body image stabilization (IBIS) that provides up to 6.5 stops of shake reduction.
  • Sony a7III: Also equipped with IBIS, offering up to 5 stops of stabilization.
• Video Capabilities:
  • Fuji X-T4: 4K video recording at up to 60fps with a fully articulating touchscreen.
  • Sony a7III: 4K video recording at up to 30fps with a tilting screen.
• Viewfinder:
  • Fuji X-T4: 3.69 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder with a refresh rate of up to 100fps.
  • Sony a7III: 2.36 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder.
• Build and Design:
  • Fuji X-T4: Retro design with robust weather-sealing and a range of physical dials for manual control.
  • Sony a7III: Modern design with weather-sealing and a streamlined control layout.
• Autofocus:
  • Fuji X-T4: Fast and accurate autofocus system with 425 phase-detection points.
  • Sony a7III: Advanced autofocus system with 693 phase-detection points and 425 contrast-detection points.

Both the Fuji X-T4 and Sony a7III are top-tier cameras in their respective categories.

The X-T4 is a leader in the APS-C mirrorless segment, known for its video capabilities and color science.

In contrast, the Sony a7III is a versatile full-frame mirrorless camera that excels in various photography genres, especially in low-light conditions.

Sony a7II vs Fuji X-T1

• Sensor Size and Resolution:
  • Sony a7II: Full-frame sensor with a resolution of 24.3 megapixels.
  • Fuji X-T1: APS-C-sized sensor with a resolution of 16.3 megapixels.
• Dynamic Range:
  • Sony a7II: Offers a dynamic range of approximately 14 stops, which is quite impressive for its class. This allows for good shadow and highlight recovery in post-processing.
  • Fuji X-T1: Provides a dynamic range of around 13 stops. Fuji’s color science and film simulations can further enhance the perceived dynamic range in certain situations.
• High ISO Performance:
  • Sony a7II: Due to its full-frame sensor, the a7II performs well in low light, maintaining detail up to ISO 6400 with minimal noise. Noise becomes more noticeable at ISO 12800 and above, but images remain usable.
  • Fuji X-T1: Performs commendably at high ISOs for an APS-C sensor. Images up to ISO 3200 are relatively clean, making noise more evident at ISO 6400 and above.
• Image Stabilization:
  • Sony a7II: In-body image stabilization (IBIS) compensating for camera shake across five axes.
  • Fuji X-T1: Lacks in-body image stabilization.
• Video Capabilities:
  • Sony a7II: Full HD video recording at up to 60fps.
  • Fuji X-T1: Full HD video recording at up to 30fps.
• Viewfinder:
  • Sony a7II: 2.36 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder.
  • Fuji X-T1: 2.36 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder with higher magnification.
• Build and Design:
  • Sony a7II: Robust build with weather-sealing and a modern design.
  • Fuji X-T1: Retro design with extensive weather-sealing and physical dials for manual control.
• Autofocus:
  • Sony a7II: Hybrid autofocus with 117 phase-detection points and 25 contrast-detection points.
  • Fuji X-T1: Fast autofocus with phase-detection and contrast-detection capabilities.

Both cameras have their strengths, with the Sony a7II excelling in dynamic range and low-light performance due to its full-frame sensor.

In contrast, the Fuji X-T1 is renowned for its color science and user-friendly design.

Sony a6000 vs Fuji X-E2

• Sensor Size and Resolution:
  • Sony a6000: APS-C sized sensor with a resolution of 24.3 megapixels.
  • Fuji X-E2: APS-C-sized sensor with a resolution of 16.3 megapixels.
• Dynamic Range:
  • Sony a6000: Offers a dynamic range of approximately 13 stops, providing flexibility in post-processing for shadow and highlight recovery.
  • Fuji X-E2: Has a dynamic range of around 12.5 to 13 stops, with Fuji’s renowned color science enhancing the perceived dynamic range in certain situations.
• High ISO Performance:
  • Sony a6000: Delivers clean images up to ISO 3200. Noise starts to become noticeable at ISO 6400, but the camera’s performance remains commendable up to ISO 12800.
  • Fuji X-E2: Known for its color fidelity even at higher ISOs. Images up to ISO 3200 are relatively clean, making noise more evident at ISO 6400 and above.
• Autofocus:
  • Sony a6000: Features a hybrid autofocus system with 179 phase-detection points and 25 contrast-detection points, making it one of the fastest in its class.
  • Fuji X-E2: Uses a hybrid autofocus system with phase-detection and contrast-detection capabilities, offering fast and accurate focusing.
• Viewfinder:
  • Sony a6000: 1.44 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder.
  • Fuji X-E2: 2.36 million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder, providing a clearer and more detailed view.
• Build and Design:
  • Sony a6000: Compact and lightweight design with a modern look.
  • Fuji X-E2: Retro design with physical dials for manual control, giving it a classic feel.
• Video Capabilities:
  • Sony a6000: Full HD video recording at up to 60fps.
  • Fuji X-E2: Full HD video recording at up to 60fps with Film Simulation modes available for video.